Pleiadian Warning About Ozone Holes ( III )

Recently reseachers and scientists of different nations have progressed so far, and have proceedwed so far in their cognitions, that they have recognized the destructive work of different chemicles, and especially bromine on the ozone belt, and want to evaluate this in their irresponsible delusion for might for war-technical purposes. They have already invented basic ideas for building missile bodies, whose destructive and deathbringing substances will be bromides. Shot up into the atmosphere and brought to explosion there, it would effect the tearing of HUGE HOLES in the atmosphere and the ozone belt and all radiations from the sun would penetrate unhampered. Such a HOLE is only slowly able to close itself again, which process may take hundreds of years, if no further destructive substances invade. An additional factor that comes into effect is that the ozone belt has a certain movement, and is wandering. A HOLE would not only destroy a well defined region, but it would wander nearly uncontrollably and also destroy other regions. This is a fact which is not yet known to your scientists."

Now this a message claimed to have been received in 1975. If so it is remarkably precient. However the book I am quoting from was published in 1988, so I have no evidence that this statement actually existed in 1975 in exactly this form --using the phrase "HUGE HOLES in the atmosphere and the ozone belt."

It is claimed in the Meier book that this information was sent to Prof. Michael McElroy at Harvard University, and also to "every foreign embassy in Switzerland and only received an answer from one, West Germany, which thanked them for the information."

The exact wording of this announcement would be useful along with some evidence that this wording actually existed in 1975.

Incidentally, the banning chlorofluorocarbons (in order to protect the ozone shield) began in 1978, and is a continuing process.

If someone can show the use of the phrase "ozone hole" in print in 1975, I would be glad to revise my thinking about this strange usage of this idea by Billy Meier.