It's been a really long time since I haven't posted anything around here so with this ocasion I want to learn and help you to make some extra money without effort. Don't think now that you will getting rich overnoght because it requires patience and if have affiliate links is much better and much more in your advantage. Let's cut to the chase! There is a browser named Cryptotab that you can find it on this link https://cryptotabbrowser.com/26133715. You can use it like Chrome, you can even import your history and so on and while you are navigating on the internet it will mine for you bitcoins. The advantage is that you can install it on more devices at once for a better performance on mining. It"s not requiring resources and other specification of your devices to work like a mining device. with all of this said I wish you luck and have fun making money while you enjoying a movie online or other activities on the internet.

Halloween Special: Dracula

     First of all I am sorry for the delay of the post that I was intended to write yesterday but who is really intersted in this kind of stories will understand. 
     I'm sure you all heard and were terrified with horror stories when we where young as kids. But few among us stucked-up in memory with a single name, if you can allow me to say so. From my point of view, a legend: Dracula. In reality he was a simple but firmly ruler of Romanian country on those days. He was born on 2nd November 1431 in Sighisoara, Transilvania, Hungary and died on 14th december 1476 in Romanian country at Bucharest. He was just 45 years old when he died. His nickname was derived from "Dracul", after his father cause was part of the Order of Dragon, in Dracula. Dracul in english translation means "The Devil", but the author who gave his adjective of a vampire was inspired by the clothes he wore in the Frydays: a black cape and a red shirt underneath. Plus that the same author attribute him the characteristics of a bat: Desmodus rotundus, named vampire. Today the story varies in different forms and the most of all we can find in the books. The most accesibile books can be found on Amazon and I will let a few links if one of you who reads this article is interested. You can find here from teenage love to the most scariest stories ever. And I have a word: A book readed is your own movie. As example you may find interestintg the next booksat a special offer: Dracula Reborn, Interview with a Vampire, Fright Night 2 and many other books related to the original story.

Beyond the Myth of The Inquisition VII

This new society is the “conflict society” referred to above, the one gradually replacing the older medieval “convivencia.” The Inquisition must be understood in the broader terms of Spanish social history and the development of its institutions. The lack of perspective of earlier English Protestant propagandists or even modern Jewish apologists is insufficient, for it often had less to do with religion taken for itself than with politics and fratricidal rivalries. The papacy tried at times, and sometimes failed, to mitigate the effect of the Spanish Inquisition. Economics, too, played its part, especially when we recall that the inquisitors, forever in search of revenue, were usually paid out of their confiscations, not by a salary meted out by the crown from other sources or taxation. Until the themes of the evolution of Spanish “conflict society,” “closed society,” and “conservative xenophobia society,” are explored fully, and the Inquisition is not excised from the whole to be looked at in distorted isolation — and Kamen insists the work has just begun — we will not have an adequate appreciation of the phenomenon of the Inquisition. The word “appreciation” is operative, because it is a departure from the stereotype of The Black Legend. This is no mere revisionism, either. What can increasingly be understood and appreciated by specialists of Spanish history must be popularized to prevent it from becoming one of those “best kept secrets” of Church history or even world history.
While Henry Kamen is the type of historian who “tells the story” so the record can be clarified, Edward Peters is more concerned with The Black Legend aspect of the Spanish Inquisition. One of the reasons for the legend is the secrecy of the Inquisition when it came to procedures:
Judicially, the courts of the Inquisition were no worse and no better than the secular courts of the day. Faults existing in the procedure of the Holy Office would be no less evident in the royal courts where reforms were instituted by the famous Cortes of Toledo in 1480. The distinguishing feature of the Inquisition — its absolute secrecy — was the one which made it more open to abuses than any public tribunal. This secrecy was not, it seems, originally a part of the inquisitorial framework, and early records refer to public trials and a public prison rather than a secret one. But by the beginning of the sixteenth century secrecy became the general rule and was enforced in all the business of the tribunal. Even the various Instructions of the Inquisition, although set down in print, were for restricted circulation only and not for the public eye. What this necessarily involved was general public ignorance of the methods and procedure of the Inquisition — an ignorance which in its earlier period helped the tribunal by creating reverential fear in the minds of evildoers, but which in its later period led to the rise of fear and hatred based on a highly imaginative idea of how the tribunal worked. The Inquisition was therefore largely to blame for the unfounded slanders cast upon it in the eighteenth century or before. The natural outcome of this enforced ignorance is shown by the debates of the Cortes of Cadiz in 1813, on the projected decree to abolish the Inquisition. If the defenders of the tribunal relied on the argument of a mystical and mythical unity given to Spain by the Inquisition, its detractors relied almost completely on legendary misapprehensions about the entire structure and function of the institution.
 We see from this that the Inquisition, in a later age, was its own worst enemy and that it opened itself to misunderstanding precisely on grounds of procedure which had been secret, often to protect the witnesses who had come forward. For example, a sufficient number of them had been assassinated to warrant their protection, so thought the tribunals.
Edward Peters employs terminology which is useful for us in making distinctions: When I use the term inquisition (lower case), I address the function of institutions that were so called, as historical research has described them. When I use the term Inquisition (upper case) I always refer in shorthand to a particularly constituted, specific institution (such as the Spanish Inquisition or the Venetian Inquisition). When I use the term The Inquisition, I am referring in one form or another to an image, legend, or myth, usually in polemic. These decisions will not satisfy everyone, but they at least make an honest attempt to remove some of the dangerous presuppositions that often creep into even the most evenhanded attempts at historical neutrality.